Search results

  1. porky_kicker

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    I have not seen, why does it matter , IA looks for the smallest excuse to reject DRDO products , if penetration is not as claimed , army would have objected on this issue long time back. Plus warhead is tested seperately by DRDO and certified for the penetration range. It defeated triple NATO...
  2. porky_kicker

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    Search DRDO thread Long time back I posted pic of nag hitting a moving target
  3. porky_kicker

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    My connection is shot will reply tomorrow
  4. porky_kicker

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    I am having lot of problems with my stupid voda connection so I am left to replying with one liners . Anyways Abhinandan shot down a 4th generation aircraft with a 3rd gen aircraft , so does it make 3rd generation better than 4th generation aircrafts as a rule ? " Exception is never the norm "...
  5. porky_kicker

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    The proof of the pudding lies in eating the pie , and importantly when the pie was cooked and eaten , 15 years ago , 10 years ago , 5 years ago , 2 years ago etc. I know a military guy who swears by 303 says it better than modern assault rifles , that's ok as long as it's his life at risk only.
  6. porky_kicker

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    The same logic can be used to justify re introduction of muskets in place of modern arms. Will you support it ? 2nd gen ATGMs requires operator proficiency and places the operator in harms way till impact . Cannot be use through vegetation and no NLOS engagement . Wire breakage is very common...
  7. porky_kicker

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    What kind of stupid ignorance is this - why the hell should drdo be developing a wire guided ATGM which is 2nd generation technology , outdated and obsolete. Jo mane mae aya wo likh diya Do you guys even know the difference between a 2nd generation wire guided ATGM ( without any onboard seeker...
  8. porky_kicker

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    Source for the info ? Is it related to propulsion or is it a demand for reduction of minimum range of engagement ? Same demand was made in NAG wrt to minimum engagement range around 200 or 400 m , I forgot which
  9. porky_kicker

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    maybe this one is SANT
  10. porky_kicker

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    :) and to allow man-in-the-loop implementation , the launch operator can observe, orient, decide, and act (OODA loop) this is clearly shown in the video.
  11. porky_kicker

    Nag anti-tank Missile

    optical fiber , used to transmit and receive data to and fro between the in-flight missile and the launcher. much better than wire guided.
Top