Search results

No This is the configuration of Akash-NG , no of missiles are adequate per launcher , multiple launchers will be there in a battery , also replenishment vehicles will be on standby for each battery for reloads Also AD works in layers

Well then let's see , we will know for sure in the future

When I posted the picture sometime back in DRDO thread I also arrived at the same claim but my reasons were different . Lattice fins are the best option when it comes to providing aerodynamic control at high supersonic speeds. Hence suited for all the way supersonic flight regime . This suits...

AFAIK Astra mk2 is dual pulse motor based BVRAAM. It will be a enhanced Astra mk1 in all operational parameters SFDR based BVRAAM is a totally different BVRAAM and will come after Astra mk2. But let's wait and see

Also if one were to remove the shiny fore section and imagine a shorter fore section in its place then it gives vibes of LRSAM/MRSAM ( possibly ) isn't it ? And importantly fits closer to ( possibly ) Astra MK2 model isn't it ? And with the extended fore section ( as in the pic ) it becomes...

Well we have to wait for that to be sure. Test will begin this year. If either you or me is correct , both will be good news lol. The astra mk2 model which you posted if it is to scale , then the position of fins don't match, neither the tapering of the nose cone nor the length of the fore...

Wind tunnel model of AKASH NG Finally we have a definite idea on how AKASH NG looks like 4 control surfaces at rear and 4 at mid section.

35km Actual benefit is enemy will have to deal with different types of guidance and hence onboard counter measures will be overwhelmed to a certain extent. A Akash launcher with both CLOS and RF seeker based missiles will have its own advantage. 1.CLOS (command line of sight guidance) ...

50 km ............................

What typo are you talking about ? Second picture has no info on range And 1st picture says greater than 13 km lock on range and that does not mean lock on range is limited to 13 km . Unless you are trying to be too smart like a porky . Trying too hard to earn your 2 cents ? Same seeker will...

Modesty is definitely not your forte isn't it Guess what you dont know about the capabilities Chinese OEMs who only exaggerate to the level of US Like when the chinese OEM built nuclear submarine sank with all hands at sea and the incident was hushed up like all other incidents. Let's not...

Factually you are correct But enlighten us as to this , don't all the global OEMs including Chinese give the CEP , performance ratings etc based on test data generated under test and stimulated conditions ? Or do they give test data generated under actual combat / operational conditions ...

Bhoakne wale kutte sirf bhoakte hi rehte hai Apne ghar ke andar betha hua kutta khudko sher samajta hai aur dinme sapne dhekta hai.

And you.... stop wagging your tail at your idiotic master. Trying to start a 2 man circus here ?

You want me to kick your ass again ? Don't comment on things you have no idea For people like you ignorance is a bliss , and let it remain like that. The only reason I give a pass to you is because it's a waste of time engaging empty brains who make lot of noise The defence minister was...

Also if u want to know from where the Akash 1S RF seeker is derived from Here it is ( my personal opinion )

Don't know if you guys have seen Akash 1S RF seeker If no here it is Akash 1S RF seeker

Unrelated but related Once I came upon a drdo research paper which talked of combining RF seeker with command guidance. Based on what I understood it seems the paper was exploring the possibility of the Akash-1S RF seeker working in conjunction with the command guided module of Akash mk1...

Is it vertically launched or inclined launch ? Any info ?

One application of the the Dual band seeker posted above is in the MPATGM Dual mode (band) day and night imaging infra red seeker (MWIR)