Search results

Dang this is 2nd pic I have seen so far, so this pod was used in exercise with usa

The software changes could have been done in service, the airframe changes is a mystery. European components are delayed. Anyways the airframe changes seems minute. As already made aircraft will go under change.. It will take time implement changes and test and certify it. In July atleast 2...

I think you don't know the last minute changes. Iaf has asked for few changes like some software changes, there was also delay in some European components coz of war, and also some airframe changes, which will obviously take time anyways would it have been possible if we had imported any other...

Ofc that's most important part to discuss. We all have did many many times. But atleast we shouldn't call and let others call Tejas inferior to a medium weight aircraft right. While explaining it's performance & capabilities. As I said size puts limitations which limits how much u can extract...

If you're talking abt me. I have come with facts here this atleast I don't think I wrote something emotional If we have our people saying there is no problem in comparing f16 with much smaller Tejas then how come we will combat false narratives. Size has its own limitations. Better we compare...

Dude, Tejas is gonna face f16. There is no doubt about it. They're is no problem in comparing it's combat effectiveness against f16. But when some one is specifically talking abt capabilities & performance of Tejas why it should be compared to medium weight much larger platform. Its logical to...

Wh Whatever, does the Audience know what LCA vs medium weight difference is.. Tejas is bound to face f16 no doubt about that but when you're talking abt performance it should be compared with similar category Then you're are comparing it with f16 how fair is that ? Audience will think too...

Many many flaws in this video.. He is straight away comparing it with f16s and gripens e which are medium weight aircraft are bigger in size.. why is this thing discussed because a retired mc from iaf has given statements in past it doesn't keep up with f16 in payload & range. Like this mc...

Why that (megaproject) guy made this video private ?? It was a good video

Not really I was shocked by his coverage that any Westerner would make such videos.. He did descent job & I think he knows how ultra nationalists indians group up:shoot::megusta: That's why so balanced video

Quite good article https://www.twz.com/air/much-is-riding-on-indias-upgraded-tejas-light-fighter-after-its-first-flight

Okay but they aren't doing this and we were discussing it how to accomodate it without structural change. I know it's like jf17.

There were only 2 option either host 2 pylons on wing & then 1 on wing tip or all 3 on wings. Tejas cannot accomodate 3 on wing +1 wing tip at once... If wing tip would have been choose then dual rack pylon can't be used.. Be approach would have been to add a missile on middle pylon it would be...

Debate ends here the diameter of ASPJ is even less than lighting ldp which is around 400mm in comparison to ASPJ Also see in this image below the coverage area from both side is very less. if aircraft is flying low.. The very specific scenario I'm picking is the most important scenario...

Yes but outermost pylon offers higher are of coverage compared to fuselage (ldp) pylon..not just that potentially the ext. Fuel tanks also block coverage to some extent. Its transmitters can do electronically phase shifting too.. Most of the aircraft like eurofighter typhoon, gripen have it on...

Dude you're all right but suppose like this you're below and missile is being fired from above you will aspj work there ? Whereas if it is on outermost wing Pylon it will have wider coverage area... Imagine a missile is fired at you you're cracking to left and lowering the altitude to drag the...

What will be the coverage area then. In a scenario where you're cracking to evade missile will that be able to jam incoming missile where it will be getting mid course updates as well as after some time radar lock ? No because aspj will have limited coverage area.. If both aircraft are facing...

GaN based AESA radars means very great performance. It will be very strong package imagine if GaAs based uttam could detect a empty clean tejas from 151km now how powerful this GaN uttam will be... And also the GaN based EW unbelievable.. it will be sensitive rwr.. and the aspj jammer too is...