Search results

Bro...everyone and there grandma knows on this forum that NATO makes the strategic decisions even when the ukrainians got pissed at them and with their sources stated they got into an arguement with NATO of what their counteroffensive achieved in 3 months because the losses were that bad with...

more info on it.

https://t.me/milinfolive/107313 Commander-in-Chief of the Ground Forces Oleg Salyukov reported on the pages of Krasnaya Zvezda that new Telnik shells have begun to be used in T-90M tanks. The 3OF82 "Telnik" tank fragmentation-beam projectile is ammunition with ready-made submunitions, which is...

this is cope to the 1st degree lol, they are showcasing T-72s, challengers, leopards, T-64s, bmps, bradleys they do not descriminate, even the head of Pentagon is telling the Russians to fight fair against the Abrams for whatever reason that means lol. oh dear god your using ukrainian sources...

guess someone needs to pay attention more to war because there are alot of reports of leopards getting hit and destroyed than I do see T-72s. check Tams posts https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/t/the-war-in-the-ukraine.8948/page-1857 I think the leopard 2s Sweden provided to Ukraine are all gone...

dead men tell no tales, leopard, T-72 crews have survived and some havent. Although I dont think anything is more humiliating than having your turret come off from hitting another tank compared to the effort of needing to use explosives. I dont see anything thin other than your own imagination...

What are you even trying to prove here? Some T-72s are intact, some are destroyed, etc. There are even turrets that come off the Leopard 2s. This leopard 2 turret was not hit by an ATGM, RPG or a drone it literally came off by bumping into another tank lol. Even if you want to go make a case...

I am not hearing any news of these leopard 2s getting recovered if you sayng not all got blown up lol, dont seem to be serviceable either to move forward. This is basically our conversation, you: the T-72 side armor is weak. Me: actually the side armor on the T-72 variations have better armour...

there is not a single ukrainian in this entire war that went thank god my ammunition was on the side because all the leopards tanks used in this war were blown up lol. HOWEVER I would not want to go into a battlefield where my tank stalls because of some maintenance issues ukrainians have...

why am I getting a 2 paragraph explanation about ammunition storage? A tank has to be destroyed before whatever ammunition gets set off, is this important as the tank crew chooses a less painful way to die without the ammunition going off? Most of the wars except the ukrainian war had the worst...

the antenna on the right back of the turret top is a drone radio channel suppression system. Tanks are visually shown having two parallel anti drone jammers on hand.

As I said serbian magic, whatever modifications they have done with the tanks was not done by the russians. I dont even know if these modifications you speak of are better than what modifications the russians have made for their T-72s. Yes the worst T-72 variations were put into battle, when I...

Unironically the mi-84 is based off the t-72m which is the worst T-model variation whatever Serbian magic was used on the T-72m is based on them. Ukrainians got pissed off about additional leopard orders because of the maintenance and general zaluzhny last August said he preferred getting T-64s...

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/09/19/7420499/index.amp leopards sound like a pain in the ass maintenance wise going against t-72s and t-64s around the same generation performance of the t-72 in iraq was based on the monkey models they received and further...