That article & its timing is to prove that Modi is Putin who murders "dissidents" (exact word used in the article).
The audience is not Internal but external. It, again, begins with the sentence in which the "execution" in Canada is mentioned, hence it is purely for a narrative of "rouge India" to external audiences. They are also preparing a "reason" for ISI to execute attacks in India & if unfortunately that happens a "sem2sem" will be done.
Now as to who killed the "non existent" terrorists in Pakistan, i am open to suggestions. It could be anyone.
Canada has nothing on the Nijjar execution, so far.
This could be seen as a step in the escalating narrative/intel war against a perceived aggressive India.
**
Also that lady Hannah Peterson who is stationed at Delhi was responsible for the "Hindus from India were responsible for the UK Leicestershire violence". Again, she & her comrades had attempted several hit pieces on Kajal Hindustani as well. She was thoroughly exposed by OpIndia & she was severely butt-hurt by that.
Read below -
Guardian ‘journalist’ offers to interview OpIndia editor-in-chief to ‘clarify’ accusations of the journalist being anti-India, anti-Hindu, declines OpIndia’s counter offer of a live stream debate
With sufficient evidence, OpIndia documented how all three of The Guardian journalists, who were hounding Kajal Hindustani for an interview, have a history of dehumanising Hindus and tarnishing India's image on a global scale by disseminating vicious fake news about our country.
www.theguardian.com
, needs to be translated into other languages and spread it far and wide through whatsapp forwards.
